#101

Of all the “major” brands making kits currently (including Adidas, Puma, New Balance, Umbro, Macron etc.) Nike are making the ugliest by far. Ever since they tried to go for a bit more brand originality and messed about with the sleeves they’ve released some hideous strips.

#102
  • Hummel, for nostalgia
  • Bettling company
  • Sponsor logo is LARGE and obnoxious
  • Away kit doesn’t have the light blue hoop

Home

image
image.jpg900×650 210 KB

Away

image
image.jpg1000×1000 83.2 KB

#103

Nice red/deeper red stripes though!

1 Like
#104

Oh, absolutely! As with most kits, it’s the pervasive sponsor that detracts from what is a great design

#105

New strike partner for Assombalonga?

#106

Those were the days, eh?

#107

Slaven yeah?
Great player / servant in his day

1 Like
#108

pretty sure that every single kit posted so far is better than our brown away kit (featuring some kid and a player we sold years ago because?)

1333×750 525 KB

not a huge fan of the home kit either tbh

738×369 98.3 KB

#112

That home kit is bloody lovely imo

1 Like
#113

Seen a few where the stripes are less obvious and more gradual

Absolutely shite either way though

Edit: just seen the rest of the thread where it’s been posted

#114

Yes! I’m fully in favour of this!

1 Like
#115

When they model the full kit without shinpads it looks weird

#116

Sponsorless version of Celtic 3rd kit:

IMG-20180720-WA0000
IMG-20180720-WA0000.jpg640×640 51 KB

#117

Day glo kits are always, always minging. Why do they keep getting made

7 Likes
#118

Because 3rd kits are always a competition among designers to see what they can get away with

#119

when they do the hi vis version of the badge too :face_vomiting:

2 Likes
#120

That IS nice, worthy of a 2+ season kit.

#121

Fundraisers could help eliminate the financial need for sponsors. That is a whole bear to tackle in and of itself though.

#122

Hi lacy :wave:

#123

Are you talking about @Huggy_Bear?