Oh rly? I just always assumed it was…seems like a good gambling company name.

@shrewbie Not a fan of that home kit, I’m afraid. Bradford have one of the nicest colour schemes in English football…but that’s a poor example IMO (do you usually use black?)

It’s a Thai Duty Free. I’d have probably assumed the same though.

1 Like

No one posted Spurs yet? Home kit has the Man Utd tummy stripes :confused:

Away kit appears to be recycled France’s world cup shirts :grimacing:

Happy enough with the home kit, not so sure about the away… it’s a bit dull. Think it would’ve benefited with a contrasting colour for detailing/badge/sponsor… I dunno RED maybe!!

Both are mid-00s nastiness.

Last year’s were so tidy. Why have they done this :frowning:

1 Like

Eek, they are not pretty :grimacing:

Shield around the badge is unattractive also.

Think these are actually early versions, think they’ve got rid of the shield.

Only about 1% better. Sigh.

Of all the “major” brands making kits currently (including Adidas, Puma, New Balance, Umbro, Macron etc.) Nike are making the ugliest by far. Ever since they tried to go for a bit more brand originality and messed about with the sleeves they’ve released some hideous strips.

  • Hummel, for nostalgia
  • Bettling company
  • Sponsor logo is LARGE and obnoxious
  • Away kit doesn’t have the light blue hoop

Home

Away

Nice red/deeper red stripes though!

1 Like

Oh, absolutely! As with most kits, it’s the pervasive sponsor that detracts from what is a great design

New strike partner for Assombalonga?

Those were the days, eh?

Slaven yeah?
Great player / servant in his day

1 Like

pretty sure that every single kit posted so far is better than our brown away kit (featuring some kid and a player we sold years ago because?)

not a huge fan of the home kit either tbh

That home kit is bloody lovely imo

1 Like

Seen a few where the stripes are less obvious and more gradual

Absolutely shite either way though

Edit: just seen the rest of the thread where it’s been posted