#20

what I find irksome about people making his argument is the lack of perspective, if for the sake of argument we accept the premise that political correctness is having some adverse effects (not saying it is) then ok, but also the right wing agenda to attack political correctness to suppress progress is also a pretty big problem, and a much more damaging one, so people should be more responsible in how they make their argument, but they aren’t and it really shows where their priorities lie.

7 Likes
#21

Yeah as I say, I don’t agree with him, just that that’s where I feel like he’s coming from

1 Like
#22

Yeah maybe a bit of a generous reading, but one based on the context and the position I feel he is coming from, which is not one of hatred or intolerance, or even indifference. I’m not sure how many people have actually read the full post he made, which was in response to the specific question “what do you think of cancel culture?”

#23

I think this idea that holding people accountable doesn’t allow room for forgiveness is a wilful myth.

3 Likes
#24

exactly this -
Cave is constantly alluding to ‘moral certitude’ etc but just look at the way he reacted when people questioned him on breaking the cultural boycott. He gives all the appearances of someone who’d never even consider that he’s wrong about something.

3 Likes
#25

just think ‘cancel cancel’ is such a loaded term, that comes with a context of existing debate where it serves a right wing agenda. He should have rejected the term from the offset, if he wanted to make an argument that it is important that there is a route for redemption he could have (and could have given examples of where this isn’t the case, who exactly has not been forgiven who should have been), as it stands it just reads as ‘people are too offended nowadays’

2 Likes
#26

Yeah I don’t disagree with any of this

1 Like
#27

It also ignores that many classic works - Lolita, Ulysses, Catcher in the Rye (of which I have read none) - were often excoriated as filth by parts of society at the time they were published. Censoriousness has always existed, although to my understanding it feels like the first time that it has been primarily targeted at protecting other humans rather than the delicate sensibilities of a privileged class.

7 Likes
#28

Never knew he had this “anti-SJW” side of him, having only liked his music and not been interested in anything beyond that

#29

Yep - he must at least know what bottom feeders he’ll attract when using this term.

1 Like
#30

People are usually very keen to praise the value of limitations in any project so maybe in the end if you can’t make art/contribute to culture without attacking marginalised people you are just not a very good artist.

8 Likes
#31
3 Likes
#32

Must take a formidable amount of hubris to think that people will be willing to spend hundreds of pounds on some doodles you’ve done of tits.

8 Likes
#33

I can’t believe Cancel Culture has ruined this otherwise extremely viable venture for him

6 Likes
#34

Was hoping Are You OK Mate?: was going to become another DiS brand like HGATR?, and that we’d get to discuss a new boomer melt musician each week

11 Likes
#35

BBC’s fault

#36

this should be a thing

#37

Mine are better anyway

IMG_20201203_170558__01
IMG_20201203_170558__011851×2523 326 KB

4 Likes
#38

This week on Are You Ok, Mate?: we’ll be discussing Billy Cor- (boards spontaneously delete themselves permanently)

#39

:rotating_light:

Stand down everyone.
It’s ok, but that was a close call.