“I’ll tell you what’s at the bottom of it,” he said. “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
Seems a different way of putting it to implying I’m the sort of monster who callously shrugs off 10s of millions of lives lost, which is what you were doing:
Anyway, no time to dig too far into this, all comparisons against a backdrop of technology are problematic.
I wasn’t saying propaganda is nothing, I’m saying the same tool that is able to target those whose minds can be changed is also the tool letting us expose stuff and dig into it in a way that simply wasn’t possible in the Cold War, etc.
It wasn’t personal, it was the rhetoric - which is oft repeated - of conflating a theme with the outcomes of that theme. It’s pretty problematic to be lazy about the way in which the outcomes can accelerate with new technology even if the general theme stays the same. It’s a kind of logical trap that is easy to fall into. I wasn’t proclaiming you a monster.
yeah but who has access to the tool? Who has the data and the results ? Who shapes their ends and controls and regulates? Who profits from directing outcomes and how do they use that profit to consolidate power & influence? And, quite fundamentally, how can law and good practice possibly keep pace with technological advancements - machine learning advancements - in cognitive psychology and behavioural profiling & processing?
We’re beyond ‘propaganda’ in the sense of the word that we understood 50, 30, even 20 years ago.
One of the most frightening things about Brexit is that the idea that Britain should leave the EU went from a fringe notion to mobilising 17.6million people in lightning quick time. It spread like a virus and has dominated UK politics at the expense of pretty much all else since. It’s a wildfire that will scar the political and socio-economic landscape of the UK for generations after the fire is put out - if it ever is put out. And the whole thing is infected - before, during & after - with the explosion & fall out of this h-bomb propaganda network that has been digitally created around it and that we don’t even really understand or know the consequences of yet…or even have much of a working language to describe and dismantle it
I think we have completely different ideas of what ‘the tool’ is then. I see it as social media and we all have access to it.
The effect of targeted campaigns on FB shouldn’t be underestimated but it shouldn’t be overestimated either.
E.g. Liverpool where The Sun boycott was in place showed a massively more Remainder vote than similar places, which tells you how knife edge this effect actually can be.
My question is what do you think should happen? Do you simply think everyone should leave social media? Do you think the Internet should be shut down for the good of humanity? If not what is it you think should be done?
My feeling is social media is the Internet. It’s all always been at the mercy of corporations. Facebook is just the logical end to forums like this, which are the logical end to bulletin boards and newsgroups. And I think it is strongly good and bad which is why I take issue with comparisons to WW2, which was a wholly bad thing. (Misanthropes, mainly, will claim good things came out of WW2 but I believe it simply accelerated stuff that was going to happen anyway.)
Or it shows you that perhaps resources were targeted elsewhere, where the analytics showed there was more chance of effectiveness. Dunno if you have ever sat in on a modern marketing or advocacy campaign team …analytics is everything and so many resources are pumped into making incremental gains, and in the case of digital campaigns the ‘tool’ is often an algorithm that is more or less autonomous to follow the directions of its own feedback flow.
I think people should stop imagining or talking about our digital society as a linear progression of physical society
my emphasis added because this is the key to what I’m talking about - this idea that there is a flow of continuity needs to be challenged. Where we are at now is an age where we are constantly being psychologically manipulated to the extent that pre-algorithmic propaganda can be seen as conventional weapons whereas algorithmic propaganda is the H-bomb. And the next step - AI & machine-learned algorithmic propaganda - is advanced thermonuclear war of the behavioural psyche.
We’re in an arms race right now and there are no internationally agreed treaties of deployment
my reference to WWII was that the technology involved irrevocably changed the outcomes of war even if the concept of war remained pretty much the same
likewise the digital society we have built and are building has changed and accelerated outcomes in ways that we don’t even yet know how to conceptualise or discuss and wont even be apparent for maybe a generation or more - the acceleration of change is beyond our comprehension. One simple example; instagram (the largest ever archive in human history) has a volume of data equivalent to the entire collection of the ancient library of Alexandria uploaded every single minute of every single day - all metatagged with geolocation, device type, software version etc. etc.
basically, we’re field testing the future all the time and the now is not the same as the past and we have to stop pretending or comforting ourselves with the notion that ‘things are not so different’ or that ‘it has always been like this.’ The digital society is a quantum-leap change in how humans (are made to) think and organise and that we are trying to govern this change within archaic constitutional and institutional practice results in …gestures at everything
heartening anti-royal sentiment today. also learned eugenie has cancelled her podcast about human trafficking because daddy is so intimately involved with epstein. brenda has an evacuation plan in place too! these toe suckers and pederasts are running scared!
j’accuse, you chinless slobbering dipshits! j’accuse!
Agree that Reelpolitik is pretty much unlistenable. I keep giving it a chance, but no.
I like We Don’t Talk About The Weather. They seem like nice guys.
Off The Fence is ok, but a smidge smug.
Trashfuture is very online but is usually a good listen. I guess they maybe think they’re the UK’s Chapo.
I also quite like Talking Politics. Quite sober, which may or may not float your boat. I’ve enjoyed listening to Helen Thompson. But she wrote a poor article in the New Statesman about Labour needing to be more Unionist the other week, which stunk in more than a couple of ways, so I’m now in cautious mode there.
Podlitical is sometimes ok. A Beeb effort to do things from a not entirely Westminster POV and sometimes actually manages it.