Best and Worst English Counties and Cities: FACTS

Social
#22

Stoke is very high on that cities list, who the hell likes Stoke

2 Likes
#23

Stoke shouldn’t even count as a city because it’s just a conurbation of shit towns.

4 Likes
#24

Guess we can chalk London off on that basis too.

7 Likes
#25

I hope they only asked people who have been to every British county and city otherwise the results might be a bit meaningless

3 Likes
#26

Surrey shoving it in Greater London’s face, again!

#27

Just ahead of the mighty Rutland too. Congrats!

#28

W.Sussex better than Kent, told you so @weeber mate

1 Like
#29

Should divide it up into Westminster and the City, then they’d both do terribly.

#30

Yeah, fuck you Rutland pricks!

#31

I just spend the weekend in Northamptonshire, it was pretty shite tbh.

#32

City of London > City of Westminster

#33

Looks like people value living close to a national park or the coast

#34

*visiting

#35

Thank you

#36

Not all minsters count as cathedrals, though, for example Reading Minster, just a church.

#37

@scroobiuspip

3 Likes
#38

Why isn’t St Asaph in the city poll? Anti-Welsh bias strikes again.

#39

Genuinely happy to be learning these facts.

#40

because it’s not in England?

#41

I’ve visited 34, which is more than I would have guessed.