Starting to get some tap now though.
This happened in the womenās game earlier, in the first innings, once the ball got a bit older it started to get hit.
Starting to get some tap now though.
This happened in the womenās game earlier, in the first innings, once the ball got a bit older it started to get hit.
State of the ball irrelevant if youāre going to put a low full toss onto a set batterās legs.
Billings looks a bit uncomfortable with his back.
The Curran twinās ability to chuck down a grab bag of absolute filth and get away with it is really something isnāt it?
I was looking forward to watching Muyeye so thatās a shame.
Edit: well that batting line up is looking very thin now.
Fuck me, 112 metres.
Oooh, would have been a blinding catch, but you get the feeling that he needs to hold that for them to have a chance.
A team hat-trick? Iāve honestly never heard that term before.
https://twitter.com/SkyCricket/status/1693706058601026031?t=oeGte4MJjVHikoGkbpzuCg&s=19
Not a thing
Itās a thing, albeit a fairly silly one.
Northern Superchargers having a crack at shitting all over this eveningās game as a contest.
Harry Brook is quite good isnāt he?
Makes all the balls his team mates wasted trying to hit it out of the ground, rather than just blocking the single to give him strike, all the funnier.
Heath Streak - not quite dead?
āSouthern Braveā is a terrible name for a sports franchise
itās a bad name for what it is
not sure what else to call it, mind
This has been far from a classic, considering this is likely to be 2nd and 3rd.
Turns our thereās a reason you donāt play cricket when itās raining, and itās because it all becomes a bit farcical
Southern Pom Bears
I think they should lean into the bearās angle and hire some big lads. Or just steal the Warwickshire players.
canāt see that Brook/Hose relay catch without thinking of how in basketball, Brook + the ball would have been out of bounds on the second bit
Iām fuzzy on how it works in cricket, but it looks so wrong and silly
yeah i thought theyd made the wrong decision the other night too, just had a look & if im reading it right - the catch was legal because when he jumped from behind the boundary and relayed it back it was the second time he touched the ball.
the law does prevent you from standing behind the rope, taking a catch & and doing the jump relay thing but it specifies ābefore his/her first contact with the ballā when talking about that, so the fact that hes already touched it legally and then jumped from behind the boundary is a loophole, i think.
technically correct, the best kind of correct.
should definitely fix that though, feels morally wrong.