my view on the politics thing is it is all fine, people have there own criteria, are not going to be consistent, and find it easier to give a pass to things they like and are attached to, it is natural. as i’ve said many times I literally draw my line around billy corgan so my line is a billy corgan shaped silhouette. but I guess the thing i’m less comfortable with is how people go about it, its one thing when people say they are personally uncomfortable with enjoying something due to those kinds of reasons, but sometimes people express it in a more objective way where it is like this person is bad and by extension you are bad for enjoying them (maybe not intended but thats how it comes across sometimes), that is fine too and there are certainly cases where that might be justified, but any arguments in that kind of area then people really do need to be consistent. but it is complicated as its easy to take dis as a whole rather than just a mass of individual opinions, it may well be that the people who are really critical of acts politics are being completely consistent with what they like to (dont really keep track with who says what), just at the aggregate level it seems like different rules for different acts. (i’m sure ive been massively inconsistent myself)
