🎵 How Good Are They Really 🎵 My Chemical Romance

Knew this would be “vote a 1 and say nothing” type of thread

8 Likes

2.5 seems reasonable, if somebody told you they found MCR slightly annoying to listen to I think most people would accept that

1 Like

They should at least be above Q—n.

2 Likes

Around or just below them seems appropriate since they often pulled influence from there but with worse vocals

1 Like

While we’re here Bam, pick a number to decide who Monday’s thread will be…

what’s the range?

1-30

21 please as that’s my birth date

1 Like

Mine too!

2 Likes

Also you’ll like that choice.

2 Likes

I think yours must be a different month or this would have come up before

September.

ooo so close…only one month off

1 Like

Should have upped 4 to a 5

Great band

1 Like

For a band like MCR 2.54 is really not bad at all :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

I know I just like insulting people.

1 Like

Oh sorry that wasn’t a comment on your comment, I fully agree.

1 Like

Fucking so shite.
I remember once a kid in school said he had a band with members from outside town (exotic!), my pal pushed the kid for demos etc and one day he handed over a blank cd. Got back and it was really well produced and polished, anyway long story short this kid tried to convince us his band was my chemical romance. So for me this band brings to mind shameful deceit as well as having nothing but bland and derivative songs.

12 Likes

Lurker scum

3 Likes

Lurkers go.

2 Likes