This is something I’ve been thinking about when doing my albums of the decade list. In the last few years I’ve been deliberately listening to more music by women than i used to when I was younger, and it;s been great - discovered so many things i’d have overlooked and got so much value from it. Now I think I just listen to everyone equally and have no (very few) biases.
But when I look back to the start of my list in 2010-2013 there’s so few women on it. I’ve since listened to a lot more music by a variety of people from that time, but i can’t deny that the albums with all the memories and feelings attached are the standard white boy indie stuff.
So I think lots of people might have had similar experiences with big artists. You listen to NY and JM when you’re younger, as some formative-ish artists, and you just prefer the guy “for some reason”. Then it’s easy to grow up and not interrogate those feelings and just assume that’s because NY is a lot better than JM. And I think there’s people that do that, that would now be much more aware of giving due time and attention to two current male and female artists, but your opinion of legacy acts get crystallised in the time you first hear them and the views you subconsciously held at that time.
So basically JM and others like her may suffer from people (/men) listening to her “too early”, before their views improved? I think some of that made sense? Hmm.
(I haven’t listened to enough JM ever to vote for her, which may just be a different problem in it’s own right)