#267

Hang on, are people eating one of those 100g Lindt bars you get in supermarkets all in one sitting??

That’s madness

1 Like
#268

Yes

hahahahah, what a ridiculous notion!?!?!??!

Anyhoo. If I like something I will do it incessantly. This is why I can’t have alcohol, biscuits, sweets, drugs etc etc in the house. If something is worth eating, it’s worth gorging on.

And the fancier the chocolate the more likely it is to give me a headache and the likelihood seems just as high if I have a single piece as a whole bar. So I’d rather have the good and bad all in one go tyvm.

#269

Over one evening for sure

1 Like
#270

I like licking, what can I say?!

#271

nah, one of those will do me two or three evenings easily

1 Like
#272
1 Like
#273

“Is a minstrel without a shell a minstrel?” is a question with strong first-year philosophy exam vibes.

2 Likes
#274

Yeaaaah knew you were a good one. Please help me here, I’m under siege.

#275

I’m am full of the taste of something at least a couple of times a week

#276

So a minstrel without a shell is still a minstrel. Count how many times you hear that said. Truth is it’s simply a ‘chocolate disc’.

2 Likes
#277

Overhyped choc button

#278

why are you all fighting over chocolate? get a grip!

2 Likes
#280

Oh shit it’s the cops!

#281

Surely a closer analogy is that snail without a shell is a slug: a completely different beast.

#282

like obviously if something is a very rich or in this case bitter taste you’re not going to want as much of it one go, that’s basic stuff

1 Like
#283

What chocolate was it please?

#285

actually I called an ambulance as I was getting concerned for all the pantspooping going on

1 Like
#286

Takes me ages to drink whiskey because I don’t really like it

Point proven

1 Like
#287

I don’t think I’ve ever knowingly had chocolate with ginger in it

#288

YER BARRED