I think you’ve baffled the whole internet here.
I’m not kidding when I say it literally took years for me to understand this joke after first hearing it.
That’s much more than a flicker. That’s practically a bonfire of acknowledgement right there.
trust me it’s hilarious
I have at least five whisks and I don’t get up until nine.
We use a reporting system here called Cognos. In a meeting I once referred to the two people in the entire business who understand it as the Cognoscenti. Absolutely nothing.
in the article there’s a whole bit where they go on about taking samples of speeches from a range of populists, and analysing the populist content contained within them, and they assign a percentage of how much populism was there. i probably should have included this for context.
I find it takes this level of explanation for any great joke
Just to clarify, I don’t actually think that explaining it has made it funnier. This is why my reply was so funny
Stop, stop, he’s already dead!
I’m still very, very upset about your nirvana one upthread theo.
the reason the joke is hilarious, is because i was taking this thinking to its illogical conclusion, adbsurdum et procto, and that is why the bit is funny. i’m sorry you don’t understand humour.
I don’t know what you mean.
Reckon a half hour set starting with a punchline, and spending the rest of it working in context to explain in forensic detail why the punchline is definitely funny, could actually be a pretty funny stand up routine
Alright Stewart Lee.
Don’t seem to be able to convey I’m joking when joking so people think I’ve just said something weird, conversely sometimes my serious opinions are taken as jokes
This is completely different, this set only lasts half an hour
Best
a big egg
Sounds like there are 100 of them then, not two.