#54

Yeah I have read them, still don’t think whedon/buffy is deserving of the god of wet end sci-fi label because I think it, and it’s hard core fans are quite different from that demographic

#55

Eh? Whatabout all those empowered teenage girls in cheerleader outfits???

1 Like
#56

I’d probably say that there’s a large intersecting Venn diagram there. I certainly know people my age who got obsessed with it and weren’t into comics or Sci-Fi but in terms of those who got obsessed and then stayed into it, I feel that group is totally the sci-fi / comics nerd group.

I mean this was mainstream sci-fi stuff at a time when there really wasn’t much else out there. All we had were this, the limping end of Babylon 5 and Star Trek Voyager. I don’t know if it would have competed well in today’s climate but back then: big fish in small pond.

#58

Excellent use of the Fosbury flop in the last panel.

1 Like
#59

I suppose, I just don’t think fans of his marvel films are fans of his, more fans of the franchises, the studios know he is a safe pair of hands but doubt his name on the credits is an actual selling point for many people seeing those films. Anyway, I was just making the point as I’m quite a hardcore buffy fan, been to various events, read forums etc, it has broad appeal, probably a predominantly female following many of whom find it empowering, so I guess I thought the no surprise typical sci-fi nerd turns out to be a creep (which he is) a bit unrepresentative, but maybe that wasn’t what you were getting at

#60

actually very true with some users on here.
Not me though, though I am very sensitive to women especially and their feelings but just because I am a great guy in real life and IdontevenlikesexoranythingI’dratherjsutholdhandsadncatpuppygifs

2 Likes
#61

I do think Buffy was pretty revolutionary for its time, because popular culture was still so poor in terms of female protagonists. Like most popular culture it’s aged incredibly badly because our media - while still veeeeery far from good - has moved on so much (and like someone said up thread, JW hasn’t evolved along with the audience in nearly 20 years).

As for being a creepster, I’ve kinda learned not to trust any community pillars or icons, especially if they are in marginalised scenes or groups. In my experience those who are the loudest and occupy the most space tend to be there because they have the most to hide, or they enjoy the power and benefits it gives them, rather than genuinely believing in equality or the cause. PWR BTTM being one particularly insidious public example. So it’s not a shock to me that he may have abused his position as Hollywood’s Shining Feminist Knight.

3 Likes
#62

… dinner?

1 Like
#63

“In many ways I was the HEIGHT of normal, in this culture. We’re taught to be providers and companions and at the same time, to conquer and acquire — specifically sexually — and I was pulling off both!”

Always great when a guy buys into some bullshit masculinity myth in order to justify behaving like a complete prick.

#64

#65

I didn’t stick with dollhouse until the end so never really grasped what it was trying to do, would be surprised if it was endorsing the exploitation it depicted though

#66

Yeah Buffy’s impact on the culture regarding female protagonists aside I’d probably lean further towards HYG’s dissection of not really seeing Joss Whedon as a paragon of feminist values.

#69

Joss weed on

#73

He wrote Toy Story too…who is this man?!

#74

The first post here!

#75

Really? Yikes

#77

so am i. i still don’t treat women like shit, and i’ve never had so little respect for one that i would cheat on her/buy a gun to kill the guy she was dating (height of macho posturing and aggression)/push her out of a moving car (no wait this is)/use my professional position as a public intellectual (if i had one) to mindfuck her so i can actual fuck her/tell my friends that i thought my mission in life was “to put my dick in as many pussies as possible”.

i would say tho he never openly said “i’m a male feminist” he definitely projected an image of himself as the sensitive, brooding-yet-nice-guy. with an eye towards banging whoever he felt like, whenever.