I’ve been using my parent’s/a mate’s sky go for years. See if you can snaffle an account?

1 Like

He’s one day into being the winner of the Tour de France and already one of the main UK papers is saying he won’t win it again…“AND HERE’S WHY!”.

What’s the point of this?

Also I totally forgot to say, “Classificaaaaaaaytion”. Cheers.

2 Likes

We did it in your absence. See you in the Vuelta thread then @meths.

My favourite moment of Le Tour, courtesy of Carlton Kirby:

“He’s gone ‘Stitch that! Sew yourself something and blow your nose on it!’”

He’s so bad

I love him m8 :joy: Just a stream of subconscious nonsense aha. Probably helps that I only ever watch with it in the background.

The point of it is that nobody would bother reading it if he wrote it a week from now until next year’s race.

Nobody really reads Fotheringham anyway

1 Like

I think everyone enjoyed how ridiculously biased it was. Especially after Demare made a worse move than Sagan but the jury were apparently not biased because they’re appointed by the UCI, not ASO.

got these

not sure why, but they were alright

you might think i posted this in the wrong thread, but no. i definitely meant that to be there.

2 Likes

Are they endorsed by a low ranking pro?

1 Like

Christian knees’s peas!

4 Likes

Snack Bauer

peas benoot

1 Like

Stretching this one…

Yohann Semifreddo

Peappo Pozzato

Christian Friedpomme

I quite like reading him. Obviously I’m not that qualified to comment on his expertise, but he is a good writer.

In fact the answer to the original question is a classic example of getting your stuff off the web versus getting it from the paper. In today’s paper the article about Froome is directly below a longer article from Fotheringham, basically announcing his retirement from full-time coverage of Grand Tours. So that’s perhaps why he needed to get it in now.