Since I’ve had enough of the podcasts threads being big messes, and I’m the kind of guy lonely enough that I listen to hours and hours of podcasts in lieu of friends, I’m gonna start making threads for individual podcasts or individuals to see if there’s enough legs in it to warrant an entire new thread.
Anyway, if there’s anyone in podcasting who deserves his own thread it’s ya boi Gladwell. The more I get to know the guy, the more he annoys the fuck out of me, even though I still find myself enjoying Revisionist History occasionally (though less and less with each season, these days it feels like he has one solid idea for an episode and then just fudges something together for the rest). When you agree with his viewpoint (which I have to agree, happens a fair bit) I find him interesting and get wrapped up in the whole ability he has to rouse you up and make you feel like something is absolute fact. However when he starts going off on one about a topic where you don’t agree with him, then you realise that a lot of his arguments are based off so much fucking conjecture and examples which fit a narrative but have such a loose connection with the real world.
Easiest example of this for people here is whenever he talks about music. He has such a bland taste in music, but talks about the artists he likes in a way that just feels so ridiculous, yet he manages to argue his case in a way that almost makes you agree with him. I was shocked when his first podcast for his new Pushkin Industries enterprise was Broken Record, which focuses on this particular theme. I’ll admit the Quincy Jones one was good, but that was because Quincy Jones was good. Otherwise, his episodes are so boring and self-congratulatory, it’s embarrassing at times. The episodes are at their best when he has as little to do with them as possible.
Anyway, other than the ones he’s involved with, I’m enjoying Against The Rules and Cautionary Tales which is enough to make me check out most podcasts that Pushkin will make. One thing that proper weirds me out about any Pushkin podcasts though is that in the credits at the end of them, the host always refers to him as “el presidente” or “the legend himself” or some hyperbolic term. At first I thought it was just something that perhaps the host decided to say, but now I’ve heard it on multiple Pushkin podcasts there’s a cringe-inducing moment where you realise that he must be telling anyone making a podcast on his network to refer to him that way. Jesus fucking christ.
Anyway, I’ll probably still end up listening to more of his stuff (except Broken Record) but what do you reckon of “el presidente”?
- I like Malcolm a lot
- I kind like Malcolm
- I’m ambivalent towards Malcolm
- I kinda dislike Malcolm
- I dislike Malcolm
- I don’t know who Malcolm is
- I don’t care