His face is on a lot of shit isn’t it? Reckon it’s dirt cheap to license him. Anyone want to invest in a business putting Mickey Mice on things?
Can someone add 'not dead please
This is a mickey mouse thread alright.
Sorry should have remembered celebrity posting protocol.
I don’t think his voice is a very accurate representation of a mouse speaking English, would be better on a seal or something.
Donald Duck is very accurate though isn’t he? Close your eyes and it’s like there’s a duck in the room, getting flustered about something.
Harsh on @hankscorpio
No, no it’s fair.
Oh yeah, he may be a daft wanker in a sailor suit but no-one would question the accuracy of Donald duck’s voice.
Never mind all this, is it not weird that Mickey and Minnie are such absolute non-entities as characters?
Mascot of the biggest entertainment behemoth going and the chief mascot is a squeaky wee guy that isn’t actually in any of their best films or whatever. All the side characters are a million times more interesting.
These are my thoughts, what say ye?
Good point. The only film or whatever I can think of that features Mickey prominently is Fantasia, and it’s about 25 years since I saw it but I remember it being basically a fever dream.
It’s kept him quite pure over the years. There’s no weird sexualisation of Mickey like there was for say, Max Goof.
If you call him ‘Michael Mouse’ then you can use his image on whatever you want and Disney can’t do anything.
This is 100% true, I read it on the Internet.
What is it with cartoon ducks being all angry? Daffy duck’s furious as well. Real-life ducks seem quite chipper
“Oh boy!” - Michael Mouse