Mouth Trouser Ratio

Social
#21

Expenses not paid

#22

byo ctcc

1 Like
#23

Isn’t it all mouth and trousers? Not all mouth and no trousers

#24

Think there needs to be a poll

1 Like
#25

i’m not saying you’re wrong, just that that makes absolutely no sense

and you are wrong

2 Likes
#26

higher than my fur coat : knickers ratio

3 Likes
#27

No of course it isn’t.

#28

I don’t want know-nothing bozos influencing anything else.

#29

en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/all_mouth_and_trousers

#30

http://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/not_having_that

3 Likes
#31

Oh I don’t doubt that a lot of people are saying it wrong.

But it’s most definitely “all mouth and no trousers”. It’s the only way it makes any sense.

There’s loads of examples of phrases people are saying wrong.

#32

You’ve got another think coming, mate.

#33

Frankly, saps, I could care less.

Goodbye.

#34

Exactly.

#35

Forever?

Forever ever?

#36

I think all mouth and trousers makes more sense - implying he’s boastful but there’s not a lot underneath the trousers.

#37

Hmm.

I don’t agree but I won’t have you killed over this.

#38

Trousers >>> Mouth

#39

Thank you

1 Like
#40

Size 34XL in trousers. Can fit an ice lolly stick in my mouth sideways. So about even, really.

1 Like