Mouth Trouser Ratio

Expenses not paid

byo ctcc

1 Like

Isn’t it all mouth and trousers? Not all mouth and no trousers

Think there needs to be a poll

1 Like

i’m not saying you’re wrong, just that that makes absolutely no sense

and you are wrong

2 Likes

higher than my fur coat : knickers ratio

3 Likes

No of course it isn’t.

I don’t want know-nothing bozos influencing anything else.

en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/all_mouth_and_trousers

http://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/not_having_that

3 Likes

Oh I don’t doubt that a lot of people are saying it wrong.

But it’s most definitely “all mouth and no trousers”. It’s the only way it makes any sense.

There’s loads of examples of phrases people are saying wrong.

You’ve got another think coming, mate.

Frankly, saps, I could care less.

Goodbye.

Exactly.

Forever?

Forever ever?

I think all mouth and trousers makes more sense - implying he’s boastful but there’s not a lot underneath the trousers.

Hmm.

I don’t agree but I won’t have you killed over this.

Trousers >>> Mouth

Thank you

1 Like

Size 34XL in trousers. Can fit an ice lolly stick in my mouth sideways. So about even, really.

1 Like