Thereās an exceptionally good, blindingly obvious song that I might have to break my ādonāt be mean in the commentsā rule for because it would be a very cynical thing to pick.
Mary Jane by Megadeth?
Is it going to be frowned upon for a song title to have more than a name in it?
i.e song is not called Barry Burton but Barry Burton was a friend of mine, (this example may be made up).
Iād assumed it just had to have a name in there somewhere.
I wouldnāt frown upon it.
Iām confused, ādonāt be mean in the commentsā?
for your own song?
I reckon Iād go so far as to frown upoff it.
thatās totally fine, surely?
In the actual comments on the game I try not to be too harsh in case whoeverās song it is isnāt a regular poster on here. But if someone picks this blindingly obvious song (nb: I havenāt picked it) I might be forced to have a word with them.
Kyrie by Mr Mister?
The round heading is:
A Track with a persons name IN the title - not a track where a persons name is the whole title so I think that would be fine (and some of the songs I have shortlisted fall into this category)
Oh weird, I was singing Broken Wings yesterday. I didnāt know they had more than one song.
I see what they did there
You can use that one on the āInjured animalā week I guess.
What if it is not the name of a person but the name of a small bear?
Not sure about everyone else but I assume songs where the personās name is part of another unrelated word donāt count. So:
Bart Simpson by Princess Nokia
The Bartender and the Thief by the Stereophonics
(also anyone submitting the Stereophonics deserves the miserable score they get)