No, but i’m saying lots of people might not get the information, might not get taught it properly, have means to change, or even be able to change if they do.
Your example’s a good one. I know lots of people who continue to smoke despite knowing it’s having a huge bearing on their health. In some cases (some, not all) it’s probably the only thing, or one of a select few things they do all day which gives them a release, or takes away stress, or proves a tool for sociaI interaction. If they choose to smoke long-term and die young or become seriously ill do i blame them? Well, no, not really, or only marginally. I’d look at the government for puting tax revenue before peoples health, the companies who make trillions of pounds a year from producing them.
I’m going to bow out of this particular debate and mute the thread. I think your position on this is…a bit off. At the same time i hate how these conversations usually go when one person’s argument meets resistance from a few, no matter how well-meaning their point might be.