#15

The most annoying thing about people getting annoyed at people using literally incorrectly is they think the person doesn’t know that is what literally means, of course they do that’s why they are doing it, for emphasis, imagine replacing it with figuratively it just doesn’t work

#16

I am the opposite of this thread.

#17

The gf thinks I’m subtly correcting her on this by replying “yes you may”, but I’m not. I can’t help being correct literally all of the time, GOD.

1 Like
#18

sure I heard recently (on radio 4) that less is really just as valid as fewer in those situations, i think the gist of it was because people have always used it as such

#19

pointing out the popular name is actually the particular brand of thing

tannoy / public address system etc

1 Like
#20

Me & The King

2 Likes
#21

Hmmm - yeah sorry. You might say I have just indulged in some unnecessary pedantry. :frowning:

1 Like
#22

Don’t ever work for Xerox or Coca-Cola.

#23

I didn’t mean that you were, soz

#24

i’ll try but i’m not making any promises

1 Like
#25

Despicable I

1 Like
#26

My sandwich / your sandwich

1 Like
#28

I pointed this out at a british cycling commissaires meeting just last week. Caused a 10 minute debate and I missed my train. Heh. I was still right though AND THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS. #TeamEpimer

#29

I, Despicable?

2 Likes
#30

I, I & Irene

1 Like
#31

Alright, Bob Marley.

1 Like
#32

Cyclists who say “actually there’s no such thing as road tax” or “actually I am not obliged to use the cycle lanes”.

GET FUCKED YOU LYCRA CLAD COCK END.

1 Like
#33

image

1 Like
#34

Aren’t both of those valid it’s just “My mate and me” that’s the problem?

#35

Silical Gel : Do not eat.

1 Like