#17

The gf thinks I’m subtly correcting her on this by replying “yes you may”, but I’m not. I can’t help being correct literally all of the time, GOD.

1 Like
#18

sure I heard recently (on radio 4) that less is really just as valid as fewer in those situations, i think the gist of it was because people have always used it as such

#19

pointing out the popular name is actually the particular brand of thing

tannoy / public address system etc

1 Like
#20

Me & The King

2 Likes
#21

Hmmm - yeah sorry. You might say I have just indulged in some unnecessary pedantry. :frowning:

1 Like
#22

Don’t ever work for Xerox or Coca-Cola.

#23

I didn’t mean that you were, soz

#24

i’ll try but i’m not making any promises

1 Like
#25

Despicable I

1 Like
#26

My sandwich / your sandwich

1 Like
#28

I pointed this out at a british cycling commissaires meeting just last week. Caused a 10 minute debate and I missed my train. Heh. I was still right though AND THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS. #TeamEpimer

#29

I, Despicable?

2 Likes
#30

I, I & Irene

1 Like
#31

Alright, Bob Marley.

1 Like
#32

Cyclists who say “actually there’s no such thing as road tax” or “actually I am not obliged to use the cycle lanes”.

GET FUCKED YOU LYCRA CLAD COCK END.

1 Like
#33

image

1 Like
#34

Aren’t both of those valid it’s just “My mate and me” that’s the problem?

#35

Silical Gel : Do not eat.

1 Like
#36

Are you pedantry-ing the pedantry thread Theodore?

#37

This is spot on

931×1073 157 KB

7 Likes