I agree with a lot of what youâve said.
There are ENORMOUS plot holes and problems with the way in which the whole wizard world works and this doesnât just extend to how it relates to muggles: thereâs a complete lack of internal logic.
How many wizards are there? Only a handful, surely, as there are only enough kids to fill one school in the entire UK (and a school with about five staff tooâŠ) and yet they have a huge ministry and a hospital with multiple wards, which surely must mean there are many many more than could be supported by one school. Then thereâs the whole âif apparating is a thing, why bother with broomsticksâ etc etc etc.
Itâs clear that Rowling was thinking about the plot and character of the series and not the actual logistics many of which she made up as she went along (fudged if you will*) many of which donât stand up to any kind of scrutiny at all.
I think itâs mean spirited though to use this to decry the politics of the book. From my experience as both parent and teacher, kids come away from HP with a âfascism is badâ, âaccepting people who are different to you is goodâ message loud and clear.
I know what youâre going to say: theyâre influenced subconsciously by the propping up of quasi-imperialist hierarchies etc but I just donât think that this is the main take away.
Iâve seen schools become much more tolerant places in the 20 years Iâve been teaching and Iâm certainly not going to place all of the credit for that with JK, but I really donât think that the message of inclusion, âyou canât call people mudbloods just because their family is different to yoursâ, has genuinely helped.
They have many problems, but overall I have seen HP books as a force for good. Thereâs some atrocious writing in there and definitely some political problems, but overall far more positives than negatives.