Recent reporting around the Dakota access pipeline makes me think that certainly civil disobedience has a space in this kind of discourse but my concern would be that the state, particularly in places like America has a huge monopoly on violence so how effectual could any strong action by civil groups actually be?

Right i’ve got it back on track pal. Stop with the pm’s you’re welcome :+1:

T E R R O R W A V E

I’ve been ā€œout of patienceā€ with you for time :slight_smile:

is this the general politics thread?

really want to see someone on here trying to defend corbyn’s plan to launch skynet

I’d punch his comms team in the face. I think that’s political violence we could all get behind

That’s just a mess of buzzwords that means fuck all. Does he post on here?

2 Likes

apparently is, shirley

I seriously worry we’re a frog in hot water, and it’s going to start boiling while we all try to convince ourselves it’s just a jacuzzi.

smart factories don’t necessarily mean an additional loss of labour, I actually think what he’s said is kind of interesting but might be worth dissecting in a different thread.

So basically embracing industry 4.0?

i didn’t know what the current UK politics / corbyn thread was

yeah no biggie, I just think there’s a wider conversation to be had about next steps in automation.

Yeah.

Tech twitter and economics twitter has gone, ā€œyeah, sounds good. At least someone gets it,ā€ while political journalists have made a big show of their ignorance of it.

Political journalists are trash.

Yeah standard, I look forward to the mail labeling his statement bizarre or something along those lines.

who isn’t trash?

@still_here said he supports political violence in a thread not too long ago. maybe he’d be willing to elaborate?

Only in self defence, but I think with this wave of militant right wing populism and such that’s probably going to need to happen sooner or later. Still not ethically credible though.

1 Like

does self defence only include when you are physically threatened? And to what extent must you be threatened to use your right to self defence?

Think if there was a bunch of seig heiling alt-righters gathered in a big group being rowdy and throwing stuff in my area I’d be okay with a ruck
It’s a context by context thing isn’t it

1 Like