Quick question


#1

When you asked someone to rate something out of 10 you’d say ‘on a scale of 1-10’ but you wouldn’t bat an eyelid if they rated something a 0. My question: is this on?

  • 1-10 but I’d accept 0
  • 1-10 I would not accept 0
  • 0-10 I’d say this in the first place to avoid confusion
  • Some other answer I’ll happily explain further below

0 voters


#2

Anyone who rates it zero clearly hasn’t understood the question, so their opinion could and should be ignored.


#3

Sometimes people like to exaggerate and this would be acceptable imo


#4

People would say a higher number too when they really mean 10


#5

Happy to open this up to beyond 10. Also acceptable imo


#6

on a scale of 1 to 10 how shit is working

ohhhhhh like a million


#7

See this is fine. You’d be like wow they hate work so much! A million out of 10!


#8

no one goes into minus though


#9

They might. I still think that’s fine too


#10

I’m happy to accept numbers outside the range that are used for the purposes of exaggeration.


#11

Best thread in some time.


#12

I’d give it 11/10.


#13

On a scale of 1 to 10, I’d give it 1.


#14

On a scale of 1-10 my patience for you is a zero!


#15

I might change my answer in the poll now.


#16

Still a landslide!


#17

Quick question: who do you think the zodiac was?

  • Arthur Leigh Allen
  • Rick Marshall
  • Richard Gaikowski
  • Donald Lee Bujok
  • Multiple people
  • Dont know, dickhead

0 voters


#18

Ted Cruz


#19

Basically whatever they said on All Killa No Filla


#20

Where’s the option for “some other answer that I’ll be fucked if I’m explaining it further below”?