Quick question


When you asked someone to rate something out of 10 you’d say ‘on a scale of 1-10’ but you wouldn’t bat an eyelid if they rated something a 0. My question: is this on?

  • 1-10 but I’d accept 0
  • 1-10 I would not accept 0
  • 0-10 I’d say this in the first place to avoid confusion
  • Some other answer I’ll happily explain further below

0 voters


Anyone who rates it zero clearly hasn’t understood the question, so their opinion could and should be ignored.


Sometimes people like to exaggerate and this would be acceptable imo


People would say a higher number too when they really mean 10


Happy to open this up to beyond 10. Also acceptable imo


on a scale of 1 to 10 how shit is working

ohhhhhh like a million


See this is fine. You’d be like wow they hate work so much! A million out of 10!


no one goes into minus though


They might. I still think that’s fine too


I’m happy to accept numbers outside the range that are used for the purposes of exaggeration.


Best thread in some time.


I’d give it 11/10.


On a scale of 1 to 10, I’d give it 1.


On a scale of 1-10 my patience for you is a zero!


I might change my answer in the poll now.


Still a landslide!


Quick question: who do you think the zodiac was?

  • Arthur Leigh Allen
  • Rick Marshall
  • Richard Gaikowski
  • Donald Lee Bujok
  • Multiple people
  • Dont know, dickhead

0 voters


Ted Cruz


Basically whatever they said on All Killa No Filla


Where’s the option for “some other answer that I’ll be fucked if I’m explaining it further below”?