Not sure I’m even gonna bother with this. Cheers.
1 Like
Not a single response. Will he not like that.
He’s triggered us silent, every last one of us.
5 Likes
Like the concept but think it could be much better without Gervais as the lead and a bit more of a straightman in the role, someone who could accurately carry off the miserablist schtick without the soggy one-liners. Timothy Spall, idk.
Tim Canterbury
The Canterbury Tales
Chaucer
Shakespeare
Increasingly convinced that he’s never truly exceeded this
6 Likes
Often find myself feeling a bit disappointed at how much of a cunt he’s become.
15 Likes
I like it. It’s good.
I thought it was decent, but not as good as gervais would like to think it was. Pretty disappointed with the last episode though, would have liked it to go in another direction
Whilst I agree, Gervais was always going to conclude it like that.
Watched the first two, laughed at how relentless the bleakness was. It’s alright.
This is very Trumpian innit?
https://twitter.com/rickygervais/status/1104592476277563394?s=19
Enjoyed it, but not as much as Derek. Probably because not enough David Earl.
not seen it but from reading the description, has he written this show specifically so that he gets to say some ‘un-PC’ stuff, in the same way that he wrote Derek so that he got to do that face?
4 Likes
No.
Thought it was great. Kept making me cry. I know people hate Gervais, but whenever his voice breaks (getting sacked in the office, the big brother bit in extras, etc…) it gets me every time!
1 Like
This is shit
Why didn’t he get more than one can of dog food
2 Likes
Maybe the worst program I’ve ever seen. Ever.
Try watching Derek. Oof
Watched two and a half episodes.
The show is basically the equivalent of an opinion column in a newspaper. It’s Gervais telling us his opinions on celebrity, the media, religion etc disguised as a dark comedy.
No thanks.
State of this though