I really liked The House that Jack Built

Not seen any of these. Rue Morgue did a nice piece on Brightburn, but I’m still not convinced I need to check it out. Might have a date with A Virgin Among the Living Dead tomorrow night though… :slight_smile:

1 Like

20th anniversary of The Blair Witch Project was yesterday, so I decided to watch it last night (technically this morning, I s’pose but spooky horses for haunted courses, etc.).

Still brilliant, as far as I’m concerned. Especially watching it with headphones on, so you can really make the most out of the atmosphere it creates and what it makes your imagination work with against the backdrop of darkness and skeletal branches. It’s one of my irks when people dismiss it as a cynical scam, when it’s really (imo, I guess) anything but.

Still haven’t watched Blair Witch 2 (my sibling saw it at someone’s 11th birthday or something when it came out and I remember pressing for details), which I’m sort of curious about just in terms of: (a) the idea of a Hollywood-ised sequel to the original, and (b) the actually quite interesting backstory and original promise of the sequel and it as a franchise …

Neither have I watched the recent reboot (my feeling is that it’s a watered down version of the original, right?) It’s a shame, cause I do think there’s room for expansion on the idea outside of the usual “milk it till its dry” franchising. It does things with the found footage thing that I’ve not really seen since.

Is that fake-out documentary they made to promote it worth watching, btw? Still never seen it.

1 Like

Blair Witch 2 is a perfectly run of the mill not very good horror film. Virtually no resemblance to the first one.

The remakes quite good. Its obviously not a patch on the original but its Adam Wingard (i think) who has never made a bad film. Definitely worth a watch

1 Like

The last 20 minutes or so are terrifying

1 Like

Would be interested in seeing a director’s cut. Based on the video below, I don’t actually think it’d be that good a film (the premise is interesting, but the satire - described, at least - sounds kinda heavy-handed), but certainly an intriguing / potentially quite subversive one.

I will have to give it a gander. Quite liked The Guest and You’re Next, and was sort of interested in that whole “mumblegore” thing for a while (The Innkeepers is a personal favourite of mine, where horror films are concerned). I regret that I didn’t watch V/H/S when it was on Netflix, thinking about it. Seems like that’d be up my street.

1 Like

Have you seen Creep / Creep 2? They’re both good in a similar vein.

1 Like

Yeah, might rewatch them actually. They became a weird new year’s eve association for me, as I watched em on the NYEs of different years

1 Like

V/H/S is good but it’s a bit more ‘obvious’ than the others. There’s also 3 of them and the third one is terribleeee

Check out Baghead

1 Like

I saw the documentary at the time (before going to see the film in the cinema) and it really added to the experience. Not seen it since though (or seen the film for a loooooong time). If I watch it again I would like to watch the documentary first again if possible

Oh yes

This has been on my list for a while. Co-directed by Greta Gerwig, isn’t it?

scary stories to tell in the dark any good mates?

Not out here yet, internet says 23rd. Cineworld has a preview on the 20th I might go to.

Reviews from the US are fairly positive tho.

1 Like

ya, whenever horror movies score in the 80% range on rotten tomatoes, usually means a pretty satisfying flick

1 Like

She’s in it, think maybe co wrote rather than co directed?

I

looking forward to IT chapter 2 after 1 was such a pleasant surprise. just been watching some trivia vids showing all the easter eggs (no pun intended) hidden in the first film. the fact it’s getting early mixed reviews is quite interesting, and i see they’ve included the aid melon scene at the start of the modern cycle which should make for a suitably nasty and horrifying opening to the concluding chapter.

hype rating: 7/10

2 Likes

Watched recently:

A Virgin Among the Living Dead, aka Christina, Princess of Eroticism, aka any number of other titles. Ah, Jess Franco, what a guy. To be honest, I’m not that familiar with his stuff, I think this might be only the 3rd film of his that I’ve seen, after Succubus and Faceless. The history of this film is a little convoluted, but basically there seem to be 2 main versions of this out there: Christina, Princess of Eroticism is the most similar to Franco’s original cut, whereas AVATLD includes completely pointless zombie footage shot by Jean Rollin for a re-release. If you’re going to watch this, you should definitely go with Christina, as Rollin’s inserts belabor a narrative that already drags at times. Our premise here finds the frankly stunning Christina von Blanc showing up for the reading of her father’s will. She soon finds herself surrounded by various oddball family members before the ghost of her father warns that all might not be as it seems. Received wisdom suggests that Franco’s films are a love them or hate them proposition, and I have to say I definitely found myself in the former camp here. Once you’ve adjusted to the languid pacing of the film, the whole thing drifts by in a wonderfully pleasing manner. Von Blanc makes for an appealing protagonist, Bruno Nicolai’s score contains some wonderful moments and the whole thing is draped in a melancholy mood that makes sense when you find out that Franco made this while grieving for his former muse, Soledad Miranda. Barely a horror film, but if you’re new to Franco’s work, this would probably be a good place to start.

image

The Quatermass Xperiment. My son and I watch a lot, and I mean a lot, of 1950s American sci-fi movies. I got him a massive tome called Keep Watching The Skies a year or two back, and since then he’s dedicated himself to watching as many of the films reviewed therein as he can. Now as much as I tend to enjoy this kind of stuff, familiarity breeds contempt, and while I enjoy the classics as much as the next person, when you start to really delve into some of the more obscure films from this period, you soon realize that not everything is as good as The Day the Earth Stood Still. Which is a long-winded way of saying that I approached this with some trepidation. I needn’t have feared. This was one of Hammer’s early efforts, and as you might expect, the emphasis here is way more on the horror than in a lot of its American contemporaries. Think The Thing From Another World, or Invasion Of The Body Snatchers, for films with similar tones. The plot involves an exploratory spaceship returning to Earth. 2 of the crew have mysteriously disappeared, with the sole-surviving member acting extremely strangely and appearing to be infected by… something. I have to say, I loved this. This is probably the first British sci-fi film I’ve seen from this period, and it has a seriousness to it that a lot of its American counterparts lack. Add to that some special effects that wisely know their limitations and an interestingly morally ambiguous protagonist in the shape of Quatermass himself, and you’ve got a pretty special film. May well have to go back and check out the Nigel Kneale-scripted BBC show that this was based on, along with the film’s sequels… Recommended!

image

scary stories… tonight horror mates. looking forward to it but then again…PG-13 horror. didn’t realise it was based on kids books. hmmm.

The Hole 3D was PG 13 and is incredibly underrated so dont take that as an instant down point!

2 Likes