#25

Depends on the ages. 21 and 16 is dodgy

#26

Yeah obviously there’s cases where it’s weird like that but being 23 and 34 is none of our business

3 Likes
#27

Should have called it ‘Back of the net’

3 Likes
#28

images.jpeg

7 Likes
#29

At first glance he looks like Mike Myers

#30

1 Like
#31

Man, that’s so naive

1 Like
#32

Although when he is 36 it’s all fine again.

Daft rule

#33

Disagree. As they get older the relative difference between their agrees decreases. By the time he’s in his 70s and she’s in her 60s no one cares. The reason half your age plus seven works is that it takes into account relative gap. How important a twelve year gap is massively depends on how old the people are.

3 Likes
#34

No what I’m saying is when he is 36 she will be 25

So using the silly rule is fine.

#35

Totally misunderstood what you were saying here!

1 Like
#36

Not gonna listen to the whole thing but it’s not terrible. (It’s not good)

#37

Damn they got me.

#38

has anybody ever drawn a graph of the rule?

I imagine it has a pleasing curve

oh wait no, it’s just going to be a straight line maybe

well I’m no maths guy!

…

oh wait, I mean the age difference

that would be a pleasing curve perhaps idk

…

no, it wouldn’t would it

…

#39

both are straight lines which increase with 0.5 for every year

1 Like
#40

yes they are

once I asked my brain, I realised this was the case

1 Like
#41

I had to use excel

4 Likes
#42

how do you factor in ages being given in whole numbers

#43

I add one decimal place

#44

Thought maybe this was a Twitter thing but I just searched for Luke Pritchard on there and absolutely no one gives a shit.