One thing that troubles me about the Jen Kirkman thing is that towards the end of last year and throughout this year, she’s had a series of really bizarre breakdowns on Twitter about Bernie Sanders, Clinton and Russia, made offhand comments about Afghan kids and also black supporters of Bernie Sanders, then did the thing of blocking users who called her on racialized language, etc, basically made herself look a right berk and so on.
Then the Louis CK thing happened in the press and the online left just took it as a greenlight to beat the shit out of her rhetorically (although they’d already been doing that), and loads of people conflated her earlier behaviour with the accusations, saying how can we believe what someone this insane would say, etc, instead of saying woah, maybe she had those weird episodes because of the trauma/pressure she felt under w/r/t the CK situation, but that was never considered. It was just immediate dragging because she was revealing creepy details about a lefty fave.
Nobody thought about it any deeper and in hindsight it was a foretaste of Sam Kriss, the Labour MP revelations, etc, how there’s this ridiculous “ideologizing” of fkn rape and sexual assault, like we should support and believe victims until they go after a public figure we like, at which point we should suddenly start earnestly debating the pros and cons of supporting these people and making MRA-type “shades of grey” arguments to protect our own sense of identity.
@Twinkletoes This isn’t a veiled dig pal, I know this isn’t what you’re doing here.