As someone who made one of these threads a few yeara back (maybe the first?) I want to defend against the critics.
Clearly festivals are more then the acts. I have enjoyed myself at local festivals with poor acts quite a lot. Far more then bigger corparate festivals (although unfortunately many local festivals are now corporately owbed which is why they all have more or less the same line up).
But I started the thread because I relised that the headliners for a fairly major festival were all mid 00s indie bands. That festival line ups are now largerly nostalgia fests.
Rather then promoting newer bands and maybe have one or two big old acts to pull we are seeing all mid 00 acts in the first 2 rows and thats depressing.
This is even worse at local festival, who not too long ago promoted current, mid sized acts, as headliners. Now they go for mid tier 90s or 00 bands. So you get Ash, Maximo Park etc headlining dozens of festivals.
Wheres the fresh stuff coming through? I get it the market is difficult but with stupid number of festivals that exist now maybe you can take a risk. That festival I used you love kept playing it safe and ended up broke. I was laughing at the homoginised depressing nature of these line ups. Of course many of these festivals are no doubt good fun.