Fuck off
1 Like
Yep. It gives me the flexibility to colour correct while itās being scanned in (because changing the colours on a jpeg will lose information along the way), and it also means I feel less guilty about editing after the scan too - when I get scans back from the shop I feel like thatās the āfinalā image, but Iāll happily carry on working on my own scans as I would a digital file.
The only scans I do get done at the shop are where I get film cross processed, because I can never get that x-pro look at home for some reason. A dev only roll of film costs me a fiver (or four fifty if my mateās on the till), regardless of whether itās 35mm or 120.
Do you use the Silverfast software when you scan in? That gives you the option to specify the film youāre scanning, which improves the colours, and if youāve over or underexposed, it feels better to correct that by adjusting that on the scan too (obviously all my photos are perfectly exposed in the first place, ahem)
1 Like
Still fucked it. Oh well
Goodness me, their website is terrible! But the Silverfast one isnāt much better. I shall investigate further later.
One thing I ALWAYS have to do to my scans is sharpen them, which I didnāt do in my early days of home scanning. Once the penny dropped I went back to some of my old pics to see if itās worth re-scanning, and it turns out that sharpening wouldnāt have helped improve them! 
Yeah, just the screen - it only fell a short distance but I gave everything a good checking over. The LCD display is knackered, though - bottom half still shows a complete (but grainy) picture, the upper half is either fractured or completely missing.
Any quote Iāve had back so far has been Ā£170-190, so Iām tempted to get a replacement screen and attempt to fit it myself. If that doesnāt work out, Iād be better off buying a second-hand body, whichāll still be cheaper than the quotes Iāve had!
I think Iām 6.8% happy with these. colours probs weird from being tester printed stuff then snapped with my phone. I take very on brand photos.
4 Likes
just trying to put together a little book thing
Itās either this one, or the next size up, but an absolute steal - much cheaper than buying a dedicated underwater camera, and much better image quality (in my experience)
Hey gang. Looking at getting into this shit. As a complete novice where would be the best starting points in terms of camera, software, lenses, any books worth picking up etc.
Everything seems to suggest one of the nikon d3xxx series is a decent starting point but yeah, some non-Bank breaking pointers would be v welcome (also loads of great stuff itt)
1 Like
second this, my phone is ok cos Iām learning how to frame shots and that but Iām gonna need a proper camera soon i reckon
Hereās a heathen opinion. If you are only vaguely invested in photography, think very carefully about whether you will actually transport a big camera body around (and multiple lenses).
I got big into photography a couple of years before good camera phones were a thing, and splashed out on a dslr. For the last three years at least it has languished in a drawer.
My camera phone takes brilliant photos - and if youāre more interested in composition of the scene itself and shooting āin the momentā rather than on super high quality, youād do fine with one of the better camera phones. I have a Huawei P30 (recently upgraded from iPhone X) and its superb.
2 Likes
Best thing to do is identify your budget and whatnot is that you want to regularly take photos of then go from there.
Plenty of people would make this kind of recommendation- āthe best camera for you is the one youāll take with youā.
2 Likes
ya my camera phone is okay but if i can frame something well and add the right processing fx sometimes i get pretty sweet results
I would counter this opinion (with love) to say that if youāre interested in learning the craft of photography then itās essential to get yourself a decent camera, at least one with manual ISO, aperture, shutter speeds, white balance, maybe even the option of flat colour profiles.
Iād start out a with decent kit zoom lens (24-70) or similar and then think about getting yourself a fast prime down the line when youāre into the swing of it. A zoom lens would allow versatility and being able to change your composition without physically moving. A lot of zoom lenses go down to F4.0 which is still enough for you to get a bit of shallow depth of field to play around with. Tilts is right that you want to be able to pick up and go and not be lugging around kgs worth of kit or faffing about with lenses to begin with.
My experience is that Canon DSLRs are great for beginners as the layout is user friendly. a 5D mark ii / mark iii would be great but it depends what counts for you as breaking the bank. Mark II is similar price to Nikon D3.
Canon is great because you can get a lot of old vintage lenses adapted to fit them which saves you mega bucks - I have some Contax / Zeiss prime lenses that cost about Ā£200 a pop and the image quality is sublime and theyāre very āfastā (fast is camera lingo for when the aperture goes really low which allows you to achieve maximum shallow depth of field.)
I personally have no experience with Nikon but Iām also a fan of the philosophy that the best camera is the one you have in your hands.
Software - Photoshop is obviously great but itās so pro that it can be a little bit confusing at first. But it wouldnt take too long to get used to the layout and learn how to adjust the levels / colours in your photos. Aperture also good.
Wouldnt say theres any essential books Iāve encountered that are much better than watching a few youtube tutorials on how to operate the camera and then practicing as much as possible.
1 Like
This is super advice.
On a side note, even though my dslr is relegated to a drawer, I also started collecting analog cameras on the cheap from charity shopsā¦ My Praktica MTL5B gets a lot of love because there is such a joy and surprise in seeing what youāve created on film. Expensive hobby, mind.
7 Likes