Watched the full story on this last night, but is it wrong that I don’t actually have that much of a problem with this? In my mind it strikes me as hyper-focused negative campaigning, and while that’s unsavoury and shit, negative campaigns are hardly a new development in politics.
I mean, if they have data that was collected in a dodgy way then that’s a big deal, and the fact that the people they were trying to put off were black is resonant with the actual voter suppression that happens at every single US election…
…but they tried to deter those voters by posting adverts with videos of Clinton calling African-Americans “Superpredators”. That wasn’t fake news - it was shit that she said in real life. Maybe if the Dems hadn’t picked a candidate who didn’t appeal to African-Americans, and had then done very little to actually try and get their vote, then they might have done a little better?
Feel like a dick for thinking like this, maybe I’m not seeing the wood for the trees, IDK.