Even if, the rules are set by the 1922 Committee and they can just changed. If more polls show a 20+ point lead, well…
Set up a Twickets alert
Genuinely wouldn’t put it past Truss to just not turn up to the conference
Goes to the Lib Dem one instead, they like her there
Tory Millenials are a fucking danger
On top of everything else wrong with that it seems unlikely he’s still got student loan repayments if he’s 36 and earning over £150k
Maybe he’sa very slow learner
Think October is always the worst month for “no fucking way is it already [month]” month of the year, tbh
Not saying this woman is lying but theres no chance that shes been asked to pay 10.4% on a mortgage. You can still get deals for sub 3%
Depends. Could be a specialist lender that deals with cases that the mass market doesn’t serve (bankruptcy/unspent conviction, unusual building construction, self employed without 2 years income etc)
No even that you would be looking at far less than that. She said she was offered 4.5% before. What she might have meant was shed been offered 7% maybe (which is still eye watering) but due to the MMR affordability rules she needed to show affordability for the offered rate plus 3%.
TBF the gasps from the audience felt more like the audience not believing her than shock at the high rate she was quoting.
Just can’t believe someone might lie on Question Time, what is this world coming to?
I’m definitely say things you know here but…
the national media is mostly people who either don’t rent, or are absolutely certain that renting is just a temporary thing for them
yep - we don’t hold assets so we don’t really hold any power
I believe her.
strike this comment from the record. wild speculation
Guys, Billie Joe is awake!
We’re discussing politics in here now