I think the second one is better, so maybe watch that one first, and if you like it, try the others.
Where does it say that I havenât seen them?
1 Like
Just a general comment, not necessarily to you in particular
Apology accepted.
4 Likes
Theyâre all very good including the one from the dating app song. I liked olde timey New York in Godfather 2 and De Niro is fun in it.
But the overall feel and atmosphere in 1 is better, also Caan, Pacino and Brando are at absolute peaks respectively.
Donât know why people complain about the pacing or that itâs just old men whispering in rooms. Itâs not for a start. But also whatâs wrong with that?
In all honesty all three would have been improved by the addition of a few dinosaurs. Or penguins.
2 Likes
Theyâre near the end.
1 Like
2 would have been better as two seperate and fully realised movies.
Donât @ me!
1/46
Hahaha not a chance
6 Likes
Part 3 is the only one I didnât fall asleep while watching hungover on a Saturday afternoon while in 6th form, so that.
You had 6th form on Saturday afternoon?
Not too bad, skimmed through it there and some interesting stuff.
No, I had a hangover on the Saturday afternoon.
Part 2 is only as good as it is, because part 1 did a lot of the groundwork.
Part 3 is better than some give it credit for.
Reckon part 1 had a bigger impact on me than 2 or 3
so, your answer is, all of them!? 
Would probably be II at a push for me, but the first 2 are just one VERY long excellent movie
3 Likes
Canât believe Marty hasnât seen any of them. Quite a major blank spot in the olde cultural lexicon make no mistake.
⌠it isnt considered the good one
But thats just me gazes
1 Like
Part I by a giant distance. As good as the Vito scenes in Part II are, the bits with Michael are tedious as fuck until the final third of the film.
1 Like
Ur a major blank spot in the olde cultural lexicon.
2 Likes